Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
Dennis R. Pierce |
GENERAL COMMITTEE OF ADJUSTMENT |
VICE
CHAIRMEN |
|
General Chairman |
801 CHERRY ST., SUITE 1010 Unit 8 |
J.H. NELSON SECRETARY-TREASURER GALESBURG, IL 61401 |
ALL LOCAL CHAIRMAN | June 22, 2005 |
BNSF NORTHLINES AND MRL | File: Final Rule on use of Locomotive Horns |
Mr. Don Hahs
National President - BLET
Mezzanine/The Standard Building
1370 Ontario St.
Cleveland OH. 44113-1702
Dear Sir and Brother:
This is in reference to your letter addressed to FRA Associate Administrator of
Safety Daniel Smith dated June 15, 2005 concerning certain portion of the
whistle regulations set to become effective in the next few days. It is our
understanding that the Carriers, through the AAR, are making a somewhat last
minute attempt to modify that portion of the regulation governing the length of
time that the locomotive horn must be sounded in advance of a grade crossing.
As we have advised the Washington Office, the feedback that we are receiving
here on property concerning this portion of the new regulation has not been
positive or favorable. I have attached a notice that was issued by the Carrier
today providing all locomotive engineers with the Carrier's best effort to
prepare them for the new regulation. In essence, practical application of this
notice will require locomotive engineers to activate a stop watch for each road
crossing to actually have any chance of providing the restrictive whistle
lengths described in the regulation. When you add in that many crossings are
situated so that whistle boards overlap other crossings, this system of counting
seconds before initiating the locomotive horn becomes all but ridiculous in our
opinion.
Maintaining situational awareness in today's environment is crucial and we do
not see that placing locomotive engineers under the kind of scrutiny that comes
with any overly burdensome regulation or operating rule concerning whistle
blowing does anything but distract from the actual operation of a moving
locomotive. While we are sensitive to the needs of the public, ever increasing
volumes of traffic on the railroad's lines coupled with current operational
procedures such as distributive power operations and constant efficiency testing
have already created a very "busy" environment in the locomotive cab. Just
because engineers may be capable of being in a constant state of counting does
not mean that it makes any sense or improves anyone's safety to be required to
do so.
We are hopeful that you will make every effort to see that BLET fully supports
AAR's petition to reconsider this portion of the rule in an expeditious fashion
and we thank you in advance for your efforts.
Fraternally,
/s/ Dennis R. Pierce
General Chairman
cc: BLET General Chairmen,
BNSF Raymond Holmes, BLET VP & Nat'l. Leg. Rep
BLET LC's, BNSF Northlines/MRL
Robert Harvey, BLET Washington
Equipment Inspection.
If an accident results in personal injury or death, all tools, machinery, and
other equipment involved, including the accident site, must be inspected
promptly by the foreman, another person in charge of the work, or other
competent inspectors. The inspector must promptly forward to his manager a
report of the inspection. The report must include the condition of the equipment
and the names of those making the inspection.
The equipment inspected must be marked for identification and placed in custody
of the responsible manager or employee until the claims department is contacted
and determines disposition.
Please have a safe week. Special Message
Subj: Sound Whistle Warning
Effective June 24, 2005 the final rule for use of locomotive horns will go into
effect. At the same time the temporary amendment to GCOR 5.2 Whistle Signal will
no longer be in effect.
To assist in determining where to start sounding the whistle as described in
Whistle signal 7, the following job aid has been developed;
At the speed indicated in the left column wait the time indicated in the right
column before sounding the whistle. Example: At 30 MPH, wait 10 seconds to Sound
the whistle after passing the crossing sign.
TRAIN SPEED | DELAY TO SOUND WHISTLE |
40 MPH 35 MPH 30 MPH 25 MPH 20 MPH 15 MPH 10 MPH |
3 SECONDS 6 SECONDS 10 SECONDS 16 SECONDS 25 SECONDS 40 SECONDS I MINUTE 10 SECONDS |
Speeds above 45 mph, sound the whistle at the crossing sign.
Use of this chart will provide 20 seconds of warning for speeds of 45 mph or
less
Train Message None,
Brotherhood
of Locomotive Engineers & Trainmen
A division of the Rail Conference-International
Brotherhood of Teamsters
Don M. Hahs
National President
National Division
1317 Ontario Street, Mezzanine, Cleveland OH, 44113-1702
Phone: (216) 241-2630. Fax: (216) 241-6516. www.ble-t.org
June 15, 2005
Mr. Daniel Smith, Associate Administrator for Safety Federal Railroad
Administration
1120 Vermont Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20590
Dear Mr. Smith:
The Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers and Trainmen (BLET) represents
locomotive engineers on all Class 1 railroads and many trainmen throughout the
United States. These individuals will be affected significantly by the Final
Rule found in FR Vol. 70, No, 80/Wednesday April 27, 2005, on the "Use of
Locomotive Horns at Highway-Rail Grade Crossings". This letter is written to FRA
requesting consideration to specific changes that would allow an orderly
implementation of the requirements stated in the rule while reducing a
significant and adverse burden to our members and the railroad industry.
The BLET's concern lies within the provisions of 49 CFR Subpart B, §222.21(b)
(1), wherein it states.
"Except as provided in paragraph (b) (2) of this section, the locomotive Horn
shall begin to be sounded at least 15 seconds, but no more than 20 seconds,
before the locomotive enters the crossing."
The nature of our concern results from the perception, now expressed by many of
our locomotive engineers, that there will be an unreasonable expectation for
precise adherence to the time interval- It has been stated by authorities (both
FRA and railroad managers) that the failure to comply with this provision by
exceeding the 20 seconds allowed for sounding the horn would be a violation of
the regulation.
It is our opinion, that discipline and/or FRA enforcement against the individual
or railroad under these circumstances would be unreasonable given the difficult
environment in which locomotive engineers must perform service. Having said
this, BLET does not believe that locomotive engineers are incapable of meeting
the requirements of the rule, but they must be provided relief from a strict
adherence thereto, but need a whistle post location mile from the crossing from
which they can measure their time; accurate/working speed recorders, and relief
from unreasonable enforcement of discipline and/or regulatory enforcement.
BLET notes that the Association of American Railroads (AAR) has petitioned the
FRA for reconsideration of the rule by adding the following language added to 49
CFR Subpart B, §222.21.
"(3) A good faith effort by the locomotive engineer to sound the horn in
compliance with paragraphs (b)(1) or (b)(2) shall be deemed compliance with this
subsection."
BLET supports that addition and requests FRA to act affirmatively to the AAR
request for this change. BLET believes the added language will facilitate
implementation of the rule without creating a negative impact on safety or
unnecessary noise impact on the communities.
Sincerely,
/s/ D. M. Hahs, President
CC: E.W. Rodzwicz, 1st Vice President
W.C. Walpert, National Secretary-Treasurer
R.A. Holmes, Vice President and National Legislative Representative
T. A. Pontolillo, Regulatory and Legislative Assistant
All U. S. General Chairmen
All U.S. State Legislative Board Chairmen